I liked it when it was called, Clash of the Titans, but only the remake because I didn't see the original. Speaking of original, what is original about this film? A step further: what is interesting, entertaining, intelligent, relevent about this film?
I guess the only only logical answer is: Mickey Rourke. He has gone from the handsome, slightly bad boy of great films like Diner, Pope of Greenwich Village and Angel Heart, to a brilliant rendition of Charles Bukowski in Barfly.... fast forward to the monster in Sin City and then The Wrestler. I know he's made tons more movies but I just haven't seen them all to comment. I was completely blown away when I saw Sin City and realized, "holy crap, that's Mickey Rourke!" I was also blown away by the tragedy of Shakespearean (f**k-off Anonymous) proportions of the Wrestler.
Whatever happend to him (and we don't have to come out and say it...), there are two Mickey Rourkes - then and now. Then was charming and, frankly a good actor. Now is an aging action anti-hero. His metamorphisis was almost Kafka-esque. His transformation, almost frightening. Yet, he still has the acting chops.
I really didn't care for this trailer, it just seemed to, as Rourke says as Bukowski in Barfly, "ooze obviousness..."
This blog was inspired by Max Beerbohm (August 24, 1872 – May 20, 1956) an English essayist, parodist, critic and caricaturist. He was once asked how he wrote his book reviews. He answered, "I look at the book, write the review and, if I like the review, I'll read the book." I sort of apply Max's approach to movies. Kind of like judging a book by its cover... only judging a movie by its trailer.
Welcome
Please email any comments or review requests to beerbohmtastic@gmail.com.
Follow Beerbohmtastic on Twitter @beerbohmtastic.
Follow Beerbohmtastic on Twitter @beerbohmtastic.
No comments:
Post a Comment